Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 8.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Dividend growth of 0.23% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 29.01%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 31.61% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.

Dividend/share CAGR of 460.05% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 428.42% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 260.00% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Asset growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.27%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 7.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

We expand SG&A while LSCC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.