PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 12.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.29%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 14.43%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
14.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 196.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.68%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 196.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 236.75%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.26%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 236.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 236.13%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.04%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
20.02%
OCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 255.11%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.07%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 290.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.53%
10Y CAGR of 54.53% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
32.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 11.50%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
2.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
42.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 42.74% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
6.47%
Below 50% of LSCC's 321.71%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
40.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 242.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
99.29%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 99.29% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
85.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 142.07%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
15.90%
Below 50% of LSCC's 496.13%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
45.75%
Equity/share CAGR of 45.75% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
3.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.15%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
508.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 508.03% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
370.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 370.06% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
203.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 203.64% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.71%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 4.02%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.09%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 2.79%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.35%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 4.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.