PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth similar to LSCC's 9.49%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
12.14%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 14.73%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
15.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 43.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
16.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 43.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
16.87%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 50.92%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
18.87%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 40.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 40.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-2.03%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.01%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 3.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.70%
Dividend growth of 0.70% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-20.85%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 34.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.18%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 33.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
74.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 43.85%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
21.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 28.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
24.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 171.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is at 800.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC stands at 650.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-15.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 69.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
65.53%
Below 50% of LSCC's 300.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.96%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1232.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
9.16%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
15.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
0.96%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
513.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
384.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 384.68% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.39%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.72%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 8.70%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.67%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 8.27%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.55%
Under 50% of LSCC's 7.22%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 3.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.29%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 6.27%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.