PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.75%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.29%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
0.24%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.66%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
11.27%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.01%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.09%
Dividend growth of 8.09% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-6.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
0.76%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
34.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 30.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
16.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 34.41%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
177.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 901.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
85.39%
Below 50% of LSCC's 322.39%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 179.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
120.11%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
96.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 158.14%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
46.06%
Below 50% of LSCC's 105.90%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
22.64%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.66%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 8.66%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
511.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 511.63% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
336.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 336.24% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.79% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.74%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 17.84%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.38%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.84%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 4.15%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 5.79%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-0.26%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 5.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.