PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 1.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
1.45%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 2.14%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 23.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 23.42%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.90%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 19.34%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.79%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 22.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 22.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.94%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.03%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
22.29%
OCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 1528.67%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.25%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 540.45%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 4.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 29.31%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 40.87%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
66.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 348.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
32.66%
Below 50% of LSCC's 206.74%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 29.92%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
628.47%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 426.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-62.18%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 509.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
30.50%
Below 50% of LSCC's 193.68%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
33.35%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.54%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 21.94%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
328.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 328.75% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.63%
AR growth well above LSCC's 12.96%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.01%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
28.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.98%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.09%
Similar to LSCC's 3.99%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
We increase R&D while LSCC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.79%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 3.31%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.