PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.62%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 19.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.26%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 18.23%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
51.57%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 165.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
129.37%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 165.62%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
82.32%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 166.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
84.37%
EPS growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.36%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
33.67%
Dividend growth of 33.67% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.22%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
109.06%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
104.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 40.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
8.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 45.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-4.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC stands at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
179.43%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
55.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
754.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 128.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
34.33%
Below 50% of LSCC's 136.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-6.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
58.52%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
32.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with LSCC's 33.78%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
24.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 28.93%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
1208.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1208.79% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
180.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.15% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
130.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 130.21% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.85%
AR growth well above LSCC's 13.61%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.18%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 13.48%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.43%
75-90% of LSCC's 1.69%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-9.11%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-7.16%
Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 11.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.61%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 3.48%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.