PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.00%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.77%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.76%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.90%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.77%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
11.84%
Dividend growth of 11.84% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.49%
OCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 56.72%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-0.31%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
40.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 82.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 39.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 52.66%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
149.80%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
34.74%
Positive OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
45.06%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
102.44%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
248.52%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
32.16%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
10.44%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-0.13%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
1175.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1175.51% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.39% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.78% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-21.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.87%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.58%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.29%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.68%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 1.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.