PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.10%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
8.36%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 84.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-5.45%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 84.06%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.16%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 34.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
4.00%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 29.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 32.70%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.51%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.54%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
31.30%
Dividend growth of 31.30% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-1.84%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 268.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.24%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 195.24%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
45.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 88.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
13.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 70.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 31.90%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
141.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 170.14%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
62.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 26.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
26.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 81.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
131.02%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
300.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
123.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
35.88%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.07%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
5.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1168.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1168.08% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
194.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 194.90% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.90% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.44%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.33%
Similar asset growth to LSCC's 1.41%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
2.34%
75-90% of LSCC's 2.94%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-0.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-2.83%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.