Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 0.00% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 1.04%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 526.04% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 192.90% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.12% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

AR growth is negative/stable vs. LSCC's 31.35%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.

Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

We increase R&D while LSCC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.