PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.45%
Positive revenue growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.88%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
20.05%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.81%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.69%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.86%
Positive EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.60%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.69%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.00%
Dividend growth of 0.00% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.79%
OCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 529.57%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
100.52%
FCF growth under 50% of LSCC's 766.17%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
61.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 47.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
38.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 23.19%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
26.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 2.48%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
61.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 497.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
63.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 83.53%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
33.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 53.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
137.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
87.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
66.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
41.50%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
10.21%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
522.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 522.75% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
191.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 191.83% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.48% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.28%
Our AR growth while LSCC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-2.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.99%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.24%
Positive BV/share change while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.07%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.