PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.23%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 7.97%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
5.71%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 8.83%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
0.51%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 19.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.95%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 19.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.85%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 17.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.83%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 16.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 18.18%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.33%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.32%
Slight or no buyback while LSCC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-12.94%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 29.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.39%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 37.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 21.17%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
55.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 1.92%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
353.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 2386.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
269.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 7.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
77.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 942.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
233.16%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 49.05% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
169.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 181.13%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
36.82%
Below 50% of LSCC's 375.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
21.69%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 3.24%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
13.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with LSCC's 14.32%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
1.85%
Below 50% of LSCC's 39.11%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
677.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 677.64% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 167.94% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.02% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.02%
AR growth well above LSCC's 10.08%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.32%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.49%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 1.11%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
10.30%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.64%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.21%
We’re deleveraging while LSCC stands at 2.49%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.52%
Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
6.78%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 2.27%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.