PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 6.15%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of LSCC's 10.64%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.63%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 26.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 26.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 26.45%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.03%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 23.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.96%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 30.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.11%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.21%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.04%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
58.23%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
94.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 80.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 27.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
38.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 46.18%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
491.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with LSCC's 473.45%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
191.60%
Below 50% of LSCC's 399.31%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
97.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 89.17%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
928.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 501.96% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.70%
Below 50% of LSCC's 539.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
83.99%
Below 50% of LSCC's 363.96%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.79%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
42.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with LSCC's 39.60%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
67.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 42.84%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
575.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 575.06% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.88% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.53%
AR growth well above LSCC's 4.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.85%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 6.18%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.43%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.24%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.51%
R&D dropping or stable vs. LSCC's 7.69%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
4.46%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 0.44%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.