PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.26%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 7.21%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
5.32%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 9.64%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
5.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 23.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.24%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 23.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
4.09%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 23.43%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
4.20%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 23.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 23.08%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-17.54%
Negative OCF growth while LSCC is at 15.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.16%
Negative FCF growth while LSCC is at 16.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
93.65%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to LSCC's 95.52%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
52.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 47.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
44.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 51.76%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
224.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 1555.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
108.31%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1012.61%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
0.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 6.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
536.51%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 404.55%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
134.40%
Below 50% of LSCC's 394.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.80%
Below 50% of LSCC's 400.54%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.50%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 0.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
42.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with LSCC's 45.12%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
69.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 42.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
573.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 573.58% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.97% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.53% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.01%
AR growth well above LSCC's 12.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.75%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 7.95%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.19%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.86%
Under 50% of LSCC's 3.47%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.88%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 3.25%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.