PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.22%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 7.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.70%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.65%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 4.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.21%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 6.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 3.13%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.76%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.75%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.09%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
56.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 28.55%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
68.74%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 32.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
91.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 107.04%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
37.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 68.06%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
42.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 61.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
184.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 333.69%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
73.82%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 136.30%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
42.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 237.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
262.30%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1913.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
93.27%
Below 50% of LSCC's 196.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
64.93%
Below 50% of LSCC's 231.76%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
57.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 2.42%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
42.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 81.31%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
65.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 38.22%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
570.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 570.52% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.76% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.28% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-6.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSCC shows 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
9.32%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 21.28%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.96%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
9.57%
Debt growth far above LSCC's 2.07%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.11%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 3.59%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.13%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 10.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.