PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.23%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.26%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 5.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-9.56%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 9.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-11.12%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 9.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-12.95%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 7.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-12.96%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 7.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 8.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSCC's 0.24%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Dividend growth of 0.07% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-43.19%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-83.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
85.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 117.50%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
25.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 61.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
35.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 85.03%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
293.27%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 827.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.06%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1481.12%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
39.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 107.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
475.86%
Below 50% of LSCC's 2384.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
35.51%
Below 50% of LSCC's 913.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.34%
Below 50% of LSCC's 568.97%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
69.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 20.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
55.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 81.58%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
102.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 46.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
491.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 491.84% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.55% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.31% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.95%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
19.26%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 6.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.40%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.45%
75-90% of LSCC's 5.46%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
11.53%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.84%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. LSCC's 3.48%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.49%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 0.69%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.