PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 1.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-3.26%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.40%
Negative EBIT growth while LSCC is at 7.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.06%
Negative operating income growth while LSCC is at 7.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.53%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Dividend growth of 0.09% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
38.46%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 16.38%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1040.43%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 11.56%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
68.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 85.50%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
13.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 75.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 83.32%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
103.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 59.91%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-1.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is at 593.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
35.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 151.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
227.96%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 411.66%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
16.17%
Below 50% of LSCC's 614.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.56%
Below 50% of LSCC's 319.38%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
81.65%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 38.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
68.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 122.18%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
101.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 63.31%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
341.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 341.28% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.61%
Dividend/share CAGR of 99.61% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
37.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.84% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
1.02%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. LSCC's 19.33%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.80%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.26%
Asset growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 2.71%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.34%
Under 50% of LSCC's 8.78%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.03%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-1.26%
Our R&D shrinks while LSCC invests at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.