PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.47%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.47%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-11.53%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 129.68%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.81%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 129.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.56%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 130.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.11%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.58%
Dividend growth of 4.58% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
15.36%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.20%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
93.75%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSCC's 11.05%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
40.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 20.36%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
22.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 13.79%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-15.98%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
80.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 4717.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 12.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-14.12%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
67.62%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
15.21%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 14.69%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-42.90%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
86.70%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 38.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 110.77%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
28.44%
Below 50% of LSCC's 71.99%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
299.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.73% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
50.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 50.84% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
18.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.30% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-7.68%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.38%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.53%
Positive asset growth while LSCC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.01%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.71%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.20%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.21%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 47.15%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.