205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MCHP's 10.82%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
7.84%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MCHP's 15.09%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
7.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of MCHP's 140.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of MCHP's 132.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-34.14%
Negative net income growth while MCHP stands at 87.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-33.33%
Negative EPS growth while MCHP is at 70.34%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MCHP is at 70.34%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.64%
Share count expansion well above MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
8.00%
Dividend growth at 75-90% of MCHP's 10.17%. Bill Ackman would press for a stronger return if the balance sheet allows.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCHP's 51.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
7.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
291.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
291.16%
Positive short-term CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Below 50% of MCHP's 180.63%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
8.00%
Below 50% of MCHP's 175.02%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
8.00%
Below 50% of MCHP's 81.65%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.