205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.39%
Negative revenue growth while MCHP stands at 10.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.39%
Negative gross profit growth while MCHP is at 15.09%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
138.19%
EBIT growth similar to MCHP's 140.04%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
138.19%
Operating income growth similar to MCHP's 132.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
11.04%
Net income growth under 50% of MCHP's 87.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth under 50% of MCHP's 70.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MCHP's 70.34%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCHP's 51.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
23.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
732.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
732.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
732.28%
Positive short-term CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.