PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.61%
Negative revenue growth while MCHP stands at 10.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-80.85%
Negative gross profit growth while MCHP is at 15.09%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-97.57%
Negative EBIT growth while MCHP is at 140.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.57%
Negative operating income growth while MCHP is at 132.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-38.74%
Negative net income growth while MCHP stands at 87.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-37.50%
Negative EPS growth while MCHP is at 70.34%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MCHP is at 70.34%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-13.82%
Share reduction while MCHP is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-13.82%
Reduced diluted shares while MCHP is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MCHP's 51.09%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
39.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
34.10%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
184.89%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
184.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
405.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Below 50% of MCHP's 81.65%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.