PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of MCHP's 10.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.33%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MCHP's 15.09%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
1050.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MCHP's 140.04%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1050.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MCHP's 132.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-15.38%
Negative net income growth while MCHP stands at 87.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MCHP's 0.33%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MCHP's 0.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while MCHP stands at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
OCF growth above 1.5x MCHP's 33.85%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
20.39%
FCF growth 50-75% of MCHP's 34.43%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCHP's 51.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
10.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MCHP is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-17.11%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-78.81%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Below 50% of MCHP's 180.63%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
76.59%
Below 50% of MCHP's 175.02%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MCHP's 81.65%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
6.33%
AR growth well above MCHP's 10.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.96%
We show growth while MCHP is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while MCHP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.58%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
We have some new debt while MCHP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A growth well above MCHP's 4.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.