205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.26%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 4.24%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
3.26%
Gross profit growth similar to MPWR's 3.62%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
3.26%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.26%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.82%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.18%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.52%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
165.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 314.73%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
165.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.