PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 4.24%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
12.33%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1050.00%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1050.00%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.38%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 0.04%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
OCF growth of 69.74% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
20.39%
FCF growth of 20.39% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 1299.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 314.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
76.59%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 99.66%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
6.33%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.96%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.58%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.84%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.82%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.