PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.37%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.16%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
12.50%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.50%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.57%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-9.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.70%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.70%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
12.88%
Dividend growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 24.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders.
-90.30%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-135.76%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
38.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 1299.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-298.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 314.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-163.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 99.66%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-5.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.82%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.88%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.20%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.63%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
18.67%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.