PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.12%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
223.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
31.15%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.15%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.78%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
37.80%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.80%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.90%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
14.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-75.13%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
35000.00%
OCF growth of 35000.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
321.90%
FCF growth of 321.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
28.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 1299.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-387.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 314.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-184.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
21.11%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1.73%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.09%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-15.75%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MPWR stands at 673.26%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.75%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 99.66%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-12.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.12%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.55%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-20.60%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.73%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.82%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.