205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.24%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
250.00%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
250.00%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
147.06%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.23%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.23%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-29.30%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-29.30%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
53.23%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 24.40%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-97.71%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-130.90%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
85.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 40.56%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 314.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 181.26%. Bill Ackman wants more robust earnings or a higher payout ratio to match the competitor.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 99.66%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
0.22%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.88%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-6.19%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.