PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 4.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
134.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.59%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.59%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
35.09%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
19.32%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
19.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-12.55%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
14.29%
OCF growth of 14.29% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
6.22%
FCF growth of 6.22% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
38.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 10.25% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
258.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 314.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
15.18%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-0.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 274.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 133.09%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-19.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MPWR stands at 673.26%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
48.99%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-6.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-12.16%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.02%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-18.17%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.05%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.82%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.