205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.49%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
39.71%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
39.71%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.31%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.82%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.55%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.81%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.54%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.21%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
65.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
26.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 40.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1140.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1140.12% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1129.69%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
52.11%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
199.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.43%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
10.94%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
2.72%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-88.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.11%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.86%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.78%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 4.37%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
6.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.