205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.55%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
1.98%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 3.62%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-0.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.09%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.33%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.53%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
28.73%
Dividend growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 24.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if management’s capital return strategy is more aggressive yet sustainable.
36.43%
OCF growth of 36.43% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
170.27%
FCF growth of 170.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 40.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32045.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 32045.29% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
282.66%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
115.17%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
232.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 274.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.50%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-78.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.83%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.58%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.49%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.37%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.82%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.