205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
4.16%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
2800.34%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2800.34%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.08%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-15.38%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.38%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.28%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
8.56%
OCF growth of 8.56% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
11.00%
FCF growth of 11.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
87.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
46.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 40.56%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 30.37% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
13.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 13.89% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
473.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
370.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 314.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
303.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
73.62%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.94%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.36%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-25.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MPWR stands at 673.26%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-13.13%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-11.62%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-1.10%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.38%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.88%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.88%
1.25-1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-4.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 13.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.