PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
27.53%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-95.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.34%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.36%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.19%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-45.94%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-90.99%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
103.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
63.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 169.26% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1795.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1795.38% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1540.34%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 1299.44%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
1453.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 314.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
274.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.87%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.83%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.43%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.40%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.03%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.18%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 4.37%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
7.50%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
3.05%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.