PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.78%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 4.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
1.19%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 3.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.44%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.44%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.96%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
5.56%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.59%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.84%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
38.32%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 24.40%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
30.10%
OCF growth of 30.10% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
26.88%
FCF growth of 26.88% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
129.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
77.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
44.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 40.56%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2867.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 2867.62% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
31.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 31.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
378.63%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
3684.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 314.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.08%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
53.77%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
10.83%
Below 50% of MPWR's 99.66%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
13.60%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.04%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
8.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.55%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
4.60%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.79%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 4.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-5.72%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.