PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.94%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
122.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
188.14%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
188.14%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
560.71%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
589.13%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
589.13%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.32%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.74%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.32%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-54.39%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-88.70%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
43.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-15.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2204.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 2204.86% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-32.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
39.09%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
104.35%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-7.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
63.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
101.36%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-22.01%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
80.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 99.66%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-5.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.69%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.01%
50-75% of MPWR's 4.09%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.71%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 4.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.55%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 13.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.