PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.31%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.08%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 3.62%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
24.74%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.74%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
587.55%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
558.82%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
568.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.89%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.76%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-3.88%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.44%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-26.97%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
41.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
2.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.89%
OCF/share CAGR of 37.89% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
31.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 31.84% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2355.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 1299.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2232.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 314.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
780.74%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 274.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
111.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 133.09%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
84.04%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
8.03%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
39.18%
Below 50% of MPWR's 99.66%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-0.17%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.85%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.88%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
28.62%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
40.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-1.79%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-11.65%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.