PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.49%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
13.22%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
597.37%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
634.21%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
215.38%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
233.33%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
233.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.18%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.46%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.22%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
82.20%
OCF growth of 82.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
146.94%
FCF growth of 146.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
9.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-11.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-40.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.19% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
6.52%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 6.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
43.07%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1.45%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-45.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.33%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
51.12%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
93.58%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
33.51%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
2.52%
Below 50% of MPWR's 99.66%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-11.07%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-19.26%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.61%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.37%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.34%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.15%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.90%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-31.95%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.