PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.12%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.17%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
10.22%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.17%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.43%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.33%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.70%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.53%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.49%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
83.58%
OCF growth of 83.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
152.78%
FCF growth of 152.78% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
12.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-16.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
101.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 40.56%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
153.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 153.21% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
94.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 94.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
34.58%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 34.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
882.41%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
108.68%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1537.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
188.07%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
162.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 274.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
99.34%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 133.09%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
10.49%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
27.18%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-6.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-5.96%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
18.73%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.71%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
28.49%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 13.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.