PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
1.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 3.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.06%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-7.68%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.85%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.29%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.04%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.69%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-58.68%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-152.53%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
43.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-12.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
14.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
322.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 322.80% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
57.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 57.02% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
29.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 29.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2488.56%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 1299.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
66.59%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
205.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
261.53%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
211.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 274.92%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
147.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 133.09%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
16.57%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
38.50%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
2.24%
Below 50% of MPWR's 99.66%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
0.10%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.81%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
16.45%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
27.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
18.99%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 4.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-18.83%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.