PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.30%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.22%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
15.97%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.09%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-6.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.56%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.73%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
17.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
4.95%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
34.22%
OCF growth of 34.22% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-197.20%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
29.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-26.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-2.10%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
7.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 7.60% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
24.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 24.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
953.20%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
90.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
299.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
302.95%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
168.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 274.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
91.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 133.09%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
21.42%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.89%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.38%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.45%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.74%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-17.26%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-11.48%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.