PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.35%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.35%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-9.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-9.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.85%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-3.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-4.27%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.27%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
1.64%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
133.53%
OCF growth of 133.53% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
2372.73%
FCF growth of 2372.73% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-12.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 574.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
44.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
27.18%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 40.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
90.99%
OCF/share CAGR of 90.99% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
16.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 16.19% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
160.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 160.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-16.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 1299.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-293.74%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 314.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-187.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
419.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 692.72%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
175.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 274.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
158.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 133.09%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
28.19%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
6.92%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
54.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 99.66%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-17.32%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.56%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.51%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 4.37%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
7.46%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
6.70%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 4.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-3.53%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.