PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.24%
Revenue growth of 2.24% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
47.23%
Gross profit growth of 47.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
83.58%
EBIT growth of 83.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
83.58%
Operating income growth of 83.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
67.24%
Net income growth of 67.24% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
72.41%
EPS growth of 72.41% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
72.41%
Diluted EPS growth of 72.41% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
18.75%
Share change of 18.75% while MPWR is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
18.75%
Diluted share change of 18.75% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-13.45%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-62.05%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-67.65%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-45.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-35.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1782.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 1782.46% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-18.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
14.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 14.77% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-148.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-123.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-112.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
216.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 216.59% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
124.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 124.69% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
49.26%
Equity/share CAGR of 49.26% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-27.60%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-7.16%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.26%
AR growth of 4.26% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
2.26%
Inventory growth of 2.26% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-1.53%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-16.01%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.24%
Debt growth of 0.24% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
1.57%
R&D growth of 1.57% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-11.96%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.