PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 44.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
40.10%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 60.32%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
452.27%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MPWR's 24.61%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
452.27%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 24.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
350.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 23.31%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
350.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 29.41%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
350.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 29.41%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.11%
Dividend growth of 18.11% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
30.74%
OCF growth of 30.74% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
19.32%
FCF growth of 19.32% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-23.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-31.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-23.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
92.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 92.96% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-48.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
5.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 5.65% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-12.50%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-69.24%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-75.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
285.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 285.89% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
105.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 105.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
42.79%
Equity/share CAGR of 42.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
15.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.92% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
6.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.77% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.43% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.90%
AR growth of 22.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
6.77%
Inventory growth of 6.77% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.53%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.98%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
11.32%
SG&A growth of 11.32% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.