PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.98%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-2.45%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 31.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-29.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-29.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
97.89%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
120.00%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
120.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-10.05%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-10.05%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-7.61%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
45.99%
OCF growth of 45.99% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
40.95%
FCF growth of 40.95% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-16.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-18.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-7.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
28.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.80% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-6.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
4.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 4.84% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
131.58%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 131.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-90.07%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-54.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
290.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 290.57% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
58.71%
Equity/share CAGR of 58.71% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
37.68%
Equity/share CAGR of 37.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
10.87%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.87% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.63% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.37%
Inventory growth of 0.37% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.60%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
8.39%
BV/share growth of 8.39% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
0.24%
Debt growth of 0.24% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
2.72%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 18.29%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
4.75%
SG&A growth of 4.75% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.