PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.09%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
128.36%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
128.36%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
119.86%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
119.44%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
119.44%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.54%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 4.91%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.54%
Diluted share change of 2.54% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-73.66%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-87.40%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 64.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-6.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 64.39%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 64.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
64.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.62% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
506.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 506.54% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-52.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
26.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
892.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-72.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
363.72%
Equity/share CAGR of 363.72% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
67.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 67.55% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-6.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
46.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.91% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
4.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.65% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
3.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.16%
AR growth of 12.16% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
11.65%
Inventory growth of 11.65% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-1.93%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.52%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-20.32%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.97%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.51%
SG&A growth of 4.51% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.