PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 43.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 68.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-18.30%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 11.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.30%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 11.53%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
3.42%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 10.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.55%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.42%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.55%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-3.31%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
92.86%
OCF growth of 92.86% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
237.50%
FCF growth of 237.50% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-16.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 66.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 66.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 66.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
23.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.60% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
10.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 10.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-41.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-18.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
110.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-90.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 285.08% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
66.14%
Equity/share CAGR of 66.14% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-14.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
15.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
1.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.45% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
7.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 7.83% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.49%
AR growth of 5.49% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
13.38%
Inventory growth of 13.38% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.66%
Asset growth of 1.66% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-1.39%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-12.30%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.92%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 15.53%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
8.97%
SG&A growth of 8.97% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.