PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.29%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 73.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
17.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 94.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
99.20%
EBIT growth similar to MPWR's 109.27%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
99.20%
Operating income growth similar to MPWR's 109.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
269.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 109.86%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
271.43%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 109.64%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
257.14%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 109.64%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.54%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 1.59%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.54%
Dividend growth of 0.54% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.92%
OCF growth of 34.92% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
28.24%
FCF growth of 28.24% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-3.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 130.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
8.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 130.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-19.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 130.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
64.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.67% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-17.74%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
4.61%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 4.61% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
151.10%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 116.34%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
147.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 116.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-34.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 116.34%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
308.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 308.57% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
72.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 72.15% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-8.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
31.93%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.93% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.18%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
5.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.69%
AR growth of 5.69% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-0.50%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.09%
Asset growth of 3.09% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
5.01%
BV/share growth of 5.01% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-4.68%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.38%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-4.57%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.