PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.36%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 8.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
75.90%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MPWR's 94.35%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
75.90%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 94.35%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
14.77%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 114.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 107.41%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-16.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 103.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
50.74%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 3.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
51.98%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 5.45%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-35.45%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
109.22%
OCF growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 131.25%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
186.64%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 115.56%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-48.19%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 73.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
21.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 73.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-38.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 73.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
36.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 36.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
120.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 120.38% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
8.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 8.97% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
71.28%
Below 50% of MPWR's 154.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
137.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 154.79%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
-45.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 154.79%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
127.57%
Positive growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
59.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-36.96%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-5.96%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-4.47%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-34.92%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-4.66%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.11%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.81%
Asset growth of 2.81% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-31.13%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.48%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-4.27%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.60%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.