PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.72%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.22%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.22%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-28.46%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.55%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-34.35%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
53.69%
Dividend growth of 53.69% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-63.17%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 120.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.01%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 171.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
0.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 218.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 218.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
18.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 218.50%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-19.88%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
67.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 67.07% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
237.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 237.16% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
130.60%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
32.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
62.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
309.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 309.80% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
66.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 66.92% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-5.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
83.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.26% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
3.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 3.43% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
2.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.09% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.64%
AR growth of 15.64% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
16.67%
Inventory growth of 16.67% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.77%
Asset growth of 1.77% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
52.33%
BV/share growth of 52.33% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-0.36%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.27%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 0.18%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.94%
SG&A growth of 14.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.