PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 65.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 85.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
24.89%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 74.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.89%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 74.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
20.16%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 74.99%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
19.05%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 75.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 75.56%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.79%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 3.46%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-1.12%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.76%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
28.75%
OCF growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 40.91%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
1975.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 36.84%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 262.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 262.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
61.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 262.87%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
45.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 45.01% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
48.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 48.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-12.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
99.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 12.84% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
21.43%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 12.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
327.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 12.84%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
287.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 287.62% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
68.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 68.15% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-0.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
81.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.51% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
1.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.53% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.02%
AR growth of 15.02% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
11.93%
Inventory growth of 11.93% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.68%
Asset growth of 1.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
1.11%
BV/share growth of 1.11% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-4.70%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.05%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 43.99%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
5.93%
SG&A growth of 5.93% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.