PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 30.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 36.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.98%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.98%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.66%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
32.00%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
28.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.93%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.28%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.79%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
86.17%
OCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 35.48%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
308.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 278.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 278.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
69.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 278.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
102.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 102.84% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
72.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
172.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 172.49% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
158.75%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
36.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
564.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
285.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 285.05% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
58.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 58.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
7.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 7.89% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
39.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 39.88% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
5.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.99% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.81%
AR growth of 1.81% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
5.53%
Inventory growth of 5.53% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
0.54%
Asset growth of 0.54% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
5.72%
BV/share growth of 5.72% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-51.52%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-6.03%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 6.57%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.93%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.