PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.98%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.41%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 2.66%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-26.33%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 32.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.33%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 32.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-12.97%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 127.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-12.12%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 106.82%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-12.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 106.82%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.35%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 303.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.65%
Dividend growth of 22.65% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
38.54%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
78.76%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-2.53%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
16.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
63.75%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
160.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 160.39% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
34.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.06% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
55.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 55.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
124.14%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 111.34%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
7.41%
Below 50% of MPWR's 111.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
492.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 111.34%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
269.66%
Below 50% of MPWR's 568.27%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
41.08%
Below 50% of MPWR's 568.27%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
2.06%
Below 50% of MPWR's 568.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
64.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
29.35%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.35% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
13.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.43% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 11.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-7.37%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 31.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 105.11%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.65%
Under 50% of MPWR's 212.70%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-1.04%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.04%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 8.35%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.72%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.